At Least They Were From A Northern Culture

I fear that none of these counter-arguments will satisfy your correspondent or any others who prefer to put their faith in a fantasy

So states Denis Hayes in another episode of Bashing Bible Bashing, the E&E's regular theological discussion series. But which side is Denis batting for? Why the "take-the-Bible-literally" group of course! Those evolutionist fools are living in a damned fantasy world of scientific proof and theories built on collected evidence.

The counter-arguments were to do with incest being alright in the beginning (apparently the Garden of Eden was just outside of Tiverton) and the difference between knowing a girl and knowing a girl. All tres persuasive as our French cousins may not say.

Luckily Denis isn't alone for by his side he has John Watts, who raises the points that no doubt strike fear and self-doubt into the heart of Richard Dawkins.

Well, by the time the pond had dried up, the fish would have had difficulty growing legs. And how is a polar bear supposed to have changed backwards into a whale.

Yeah - right on. How did the polar bear change back into a whale? Answer me that Jonathan Miller. And here are some of the other questions John wants answered that he didn't have room in his letter for:

* If men didn't live at the same time as the dinosaurs, how can we explain the Flinstones and the Volvic adverts?
* Why haven't we evolved some real cool powers like flying and x-ray eyes and shit?
* Who can fit your windows, make them more secure, keep out the rain, no need to paint again?

As John sayz:

Why is no one asking these questions and many similar ones and why can evolutionists give no answers?

Oh wait: I know. Because they are the demented scribblings of a man whose brain has been washed and spun at 1600 rpm. Go on, get outta here.